Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 656 SO2D 398 - Bishop v. State

Bishop v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · United States v. Ewell · Smith v. Hooey · 381 So. 2d 1057 - Wade v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Regarding this element of the Barker v. Wingo , 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), analysis, it is an established principle of Alabama law that a defendant is not denied a speedy trial merely because of the passage of time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “no subpoenas for [these] witnesses] for the first trial date,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.