Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 656 So. 2d 432 - Windom v. State

656 So. 2d 432 - Windom v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
5
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 77 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 751 So. 2d 537 - Goodwin v. State (1999), State v. Muhammad (1996)

1 federal appellate · 77 state decisions

400199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Payne v. Tennessee · United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Andrijevic v. Kelleran

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the victim's uniqueness as an individual human being and the resultant loss to the community's members by the victim's death.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “requir[ed] a Neil inquiry when an objection is raised that a peremptory challenge is being used in a racially discriminatory manner. However, a timely objection and a demonstration on the record that the challenged person is a member of a distinct racial group have consistently been held to be necessary.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “impermissibly affect[ ] the weighing of the aggravators and mitigators”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.