Farr v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2016
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Woodson v. North Carolina · Liteky v. United States · Nebraska v. Wyoming · National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in at least those cases in which the defendant essentially is not challenging imposition of the death penalty.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]t the trial level, the defendant is entitled to control the overall objectives of counsel's argument,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Informed decision-making is essential to the integrity of the judicial sentencing process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.