Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 656 SO2D 455 - Armstrong v. State

Armstrong v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Singleton v. State · Mancebo v. State · Painewebber Inc. v. Hall · 504 So. 2d 783 - Amrein v. State · Armstrong v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Section 922.051 provides as follows: § 922.051 Imprisonment in County Jail, Term of One Year of Less. When a statute expressly directs that imprisonment be in a state prison, the court may impose a sentence of imprisonment in the county jail if the total of a prisoner's cumulative sentences is not more than one year.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We acknowledge that under this interpretation it is possible that a person convicted of two felonies could be sentenced to only one year in county jail, depending upon the sentencing guidelines, whereas a person committing two misdemeanors may receive consecutive one-year terms. However, we find that it is properly within the purview of the legislature to weigh the various policy considerations and determine whether defendants should be sentenced to more than a year in county jail if convicted of multiple misdemeanors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.