Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

656 So. 2d 483

Docket No. 84426.

Higgins v. State

Andrew HIGGINS, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 22, 1995.

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1995-06-22

Relies on State v. Tremmel

Decided 1995-06-22

¶1James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for petitioners.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for respondent.

¶3*484 SHAW, Justice.

¶4Andrew Higgins and Ernie Bennett seek review of the district court decision reported as State v. Tremmel, 644 So.2d 102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), wherein the court certified a question concerning the constitutionality of Florida's anti-stalking statute, section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

¶5We recently upheld the constitutionality of this statute in Bouters v. State, 20 Fla. L. Weekly S186, ___ So.2d ___ [1995 WL 242403] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly, we approve Tremmel.

¶6It is so ordered.

¶7GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

/656/so2d/483 · .json · Public domain