656 So. 2d 560 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 109 So. 2d 7 - Singer v. State · Trotter v. State · 477 So. 2d 553 - Hill v. State · 654 So. 2d 917 - In re Florida Rules of Judicial Administration-Court Reporting · 648 So. 2d 715 - Perez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Where a juror demonstrates a strong bias for or against the credibility of one side or another, which he or she is unsure can be put aside, a challenge for cause should be granted. The underlying principle is that `a juror is not impartial when one side must overcome a preconceived opinion in order to prevail.'"”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“initial strong and candid statements displayed unequivocal bias which favored the wife.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.