Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

656 So. 2d 569

Drakes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-06-14

Relies on 655 So. 2d 111 - Reyes v. State · 635 So. 2d 1032 - Sutton v. State

Decided 1995-06-14

WHATLEY, Judge.

¶1The appellant, Chesterfield Drakes, challenges his judgment and sentence for aggravated battery. We find merit only in his contention that the trial court erred in imposing a cost of $2.00 pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), without announcing that cost at sentencing. That cost was a discretionary cost, which required notice and an opportunity to be heard. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Priest v. State, 20 Fla. L. Weekly 84, — So.2d-(Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 28, 1994); Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Since Drakes was not given notice and an opportunity to be heard as to that cost, the $2.00 imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13) is hereby stricken. Drakes’ judgment and sentence is otherwise affirmed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.
/656/so2d/569 · .json · Public domain