Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

656 So. 2d 633

Burke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-07-07

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1999

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-07-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant has raised several issues on appeal. We find no merit to any of his arguments except in respect to his contention, conceded by the state, that there is a scrivener’s error on the face of the judgment entered below which reflects that Count II of said judgment is a second degree, rather than a third degree, felony. We order this scrivener’s error corrected. Otherwise, the judgment is affirmed.

¶2AFFIRMED as corrected.

PETERSON, C.J., and COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.
/656/so2d/633 · .json · Public domain