Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 656 So. 2d 68 - Lockett v. State

656 So. 2d 68 - Lockett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2017

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

50199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cablevision Co. v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America, Inc. · City of Long Beach v. Southwest Aircraft Services, Inc. · Wiston XXIV Ltd. Partnership v. Balcor Pension Investors V. · Faraga v. Mississippi · 517 So. 2d 1346 - Lockett v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) A motion for relief under this chapter shall be made within three (3) years after the time in which the prisoner's direct appeal is ruled upon by the supreme court of Mississippi or, in case no appeal is taken, within three (3) years after the time for taking an appeal from the judgment of conviction or sentence has expired, or in case of a guilty plea, within three (3) years after entry of the judgment of conviction. Excepted from this three year statute of limitations are those cases in which the prisoner can demonstrate either that there has been an intervening decision of the supreme court of either the state of Mississippi or the United States which would have actually adversely affected the outcome of his conviction or sentence or that he has evidence, not reasonably discoverable at the time of trial, which is of such nature that it would be practically conclusive that had such been introduced at trial it would have caused a different result in the conviction or sentence. Likewise excepted are those cases in which the prisoner claims that his sentence has expired, or his probation, parole or conditional release has been unlawfully revoked.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “None of the fifteen (15) grounds contained in Lockett’s first application for post-conviction relief filed by his second set of lawyers assailed the voluntariness of Lockett’s confession.... It is" too late now to reconstitute this issue in a second and successive application for post-conviction relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The statutory exceptions to the time bar are (1) allegations of supervening insanity, (2) intervening decisions which would have adversely affected the outcome of Lockett's conviction or sentence, and (3) newly discovered evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.