Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 656 SW2D 171 - Morgan v. State

Morgan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1985
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 144th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Draper v. United States · Ferguson v. State · Wooten v. State · Isam v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal under the rules hereinafter prescribed, provided, however, before the defendant who has been convicted upon either his plea of guilty or plea of nolo contendere before the court and the court, upon the election of the defendant, assesses punishment and the punishment does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant and his attorney may prosecute his appeal, he must have permission of the trial court, except on those matters which have been raised by written motion filed prior to trial. This article in no way affects appeals pursuant to Article 44.17 of this chapter."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.