¶1ORDER
¶2This is a direct appeal from a jury conviction for rape, in violation of § 566.030, RSMo 1978.
¶3No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.
¶4Judgment affirmed.
¶5All concur.
¶6Rule 30.25(b).
656 S.W.2d 312
State v. Everhart
Decided August 9, 1983
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1983-08-09
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1991
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1983-08-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →