Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 657 F.2d 1115 - Server v. Interpace Corp.

Server v. Interpace Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

657 F.2d 1115 · 1981

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
August 1994
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. · United States v. Stauffer Chemical Co. · Program Engineering, Inc. v. Triangle Publications, Inc. · Buczynski v. General Motors Corp. · Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “statutory definition of 'non-forfeitable' assures that an employee's claim to the protected benefit is legally enforceable, but it does not guarantee a particular amount or a method for calculating the benefit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “no basis on which to distinguish this case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.