Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 657 F.2d 124 - Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago’s Empirical Analysis

657 F.2d 124 · 1981

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois State Board of Elections v. Socialist Workers Party · Penn v. San Juan Hospital, Inc. · Eli Lilly & Co. v. Generix Drug Sales, Inc. · Pughsley v. 3750 Lake Shore Drive Cooperative Building · Nationwide Amusements, Inc. v. Nattin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence adduced at the preliminary injunction hearing may be incomplete because “[a] plaintiff putting on his case for temporary relief may hold back evidence, or indeed, his case may not be fully developed. Thus it is important for him to know that when he puts on his evidence he is having his final ‘day in court’ ”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.