United States v. Dellinger’s Empirical Analysis
657 F.2d 140 · 1981
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2005 · most notably Hirabayashi v. United States (1987), United States v. Keane (1988)
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Allen · United State v. Morgan · United States v. Addonizio · Walker v. City of Birmingham · United States v. Mayer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Continuation of litigation after final judgment and exhaustion or waiver of any statutory right of review should be allowed through this extraordinary remedy [coram nobis] only under circumstances compelling such action to achieve justice.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“for errors of fact ... in those cases where the errors [are] of the most fundamental character, that is, such as rendered the proceeding itself invalid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is probable that a different result would have occurred had the error not been made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.