Arnold v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
657 F.2d 83 · 1981
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2003
18 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Adult Parole Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In view of the foregoing, this Court concludes that the twenty seven year delay has prejudiced respondent’s ability to respond in a meaningful way to petitioner’s claims. Our Rule 9(a) analysis, however, does not end here. Delay is excused if petitioner can show that his petition is based on grounds of which he could not have had knowledge by the exercise of reasonable diligence before the circumstances prejudicial to the state occurred. No such showing has been made, in this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Buchanon v. Mintzes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.