Ryan v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
657 F.3d 604 · 2011
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on MacHibroda v. United States · Roe, Warden v. Flores-Ortega · Bracy v. Gramley · Rodriquez v. United States · Payne v. Pauley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e recognize that further factual development need not involve the full panoply of discovery techniques or even a hearing.”); see also Rule 7(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for U.S. Dist. Cts. (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.