Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 657 F.3d 641 - Huon v. Johnson & Bell, Ltd.

Huon v. Johnson & Bell, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

657 F.3d 641 · 2011

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. · Martinez v. California · Kline v. Burke Construction Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although all of Huon's claims relate[d] to alleged mistreatment he suffered at work, the evidence necessary to establish defamation or emotional distress would be different from that required to prove discrimination. ... [I]t [wa]s unlikely that allegations of discrimination would come up in his state suit, despite Huon's passing references in his state complaint to discriminatory treatment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “ha[d] been languishing for almost two years on the assumption that the Illinois circuit court's judgment w[ould] someday be affirmed, but that outcome [wa]s far from certain.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the real motivation behind the district court's decision was its guess that res judicata would eventually preclude all of Huon's claims in federal court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.