Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 657 F.3d 664 - Clarett v. Roberts

Clarett v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

657 F.3d 664 · 2011

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
June 2024
most recently cited

19 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Ornelas v. United States · Hunter v. Bryant · Ohler v. United States · Williamson v. Consolidated Rail Corp. · Llaguno v. Mingey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The logic of Ohler applies with equal force in both criminal and civil cases. The tactical nature of each party’s decisions is the same; indeed, the stakes are higher in a criminal case, and still the Supreme Court found waiver.”); Canny v. Dr. Pepper/Seven-Up Bottling Grp., Inc., 439 F.3d 894 , 904 (8th Cir. 2006) (holding that”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We have repeatedly held that undeveloped arguments are considered waived.”). Moreover, Sandefur’s briefing in support of his motion for summary judgment does not contend that the restriction was content based. (See Dkt. Nos. 71, 83.) Finally, Sandefur admits specifically that Moser decided to prevent Sandefur from returning to the Board meeting because of safety concerns, which are plainly content neutral. (Dkt. No. 80 ¶ D3) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A new trial may be granted if the verdict is against the clear weight of the evidence or the trial was unfair to the moving party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.