Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 657 FSUPP 119 - Simms v. Farris

Simms v. Farris’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
January 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. · California v. LaRue · Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp. · Brown-Forman Distillers Corporation v. New York State Liquor Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No retail package or drink license for the sale of distilled spirits or wine shall be issued for any premises used as or in connection with the operation of any business in which a substantial part of the commercial transaction consists of selling at retail staple groceries or gasoline and lubricating oil.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.