Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 657 NW2D 853 - Peterson v. BASF Corp.

Peterson v. BASF Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Buckman Company V.' Legal Committee · Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co. · Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Ass'n · Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “BASF’s proposed instructions do not relate directly to the charge before the jury, which was whether BASF violated the NJCFA. Further, throughout the entire trial, the jury heard numerous discussions of these issues and the various witnesses’ descriptions of the effect of the regulations. These topics were more properly the subject of counsel’s final argument rather than jury instructions, and the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the request to include these instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.