Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 657 P2D 1271 - Hackford v. Snow

Hackford v. Snow’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2024

2 district · 8 state decisions

4019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Management Services Corp. v. Development Associates · 3 Utah 2d 59 - Jacobson v. Swan · Perkins v. Spencer · 18 Utah 2d 368 - Pitcher v. Lauritzen · 2 Utah 2d 309 - Calder v. Third Judicial District Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The forcible entry and detainer statute provides a speedy and adequate remedy against a tenant who wrongfully is in possession of land. However, it is not the exclusive remedy to oust one who is in wrongful possession. Generally, an action of ejectment will lie to recover the possession of leased premises where the tenant has retained possession after expiration of the term, or for nonpayment of rent or for forfeiture of the lease by breach of the conditions thereof, where it is stipulated in the lease that the lessor shall have the right to re-enter for such nonpayment of rent or breach of condition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Generally, a lease may be unilaterally terminated prior to the expiration of its term by exercise of an option to terminate or by enforcement of a forfeiture. A forfeiture of the leasehold may result by virtue of a clause in the lease providing for forfeiture in case of breach of covenant or condition. Where such is clearly provided for, the courts will generally enforce it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.