Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 657 P2D 240 - Matheson v. Ferry

Matheson v. Ferry’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Interrogatories Propounded by the Senate Concerning House Bill 1078 · 25 Utah 2d 277 - Nelson v. Miller · Matheson v. Ferry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the whole fundamental concept of a tripartite system of government with coequal and coordinate branches of government, as well as our deep-rooted tradition of limiting the powers of government by a written constitution, would be jeopardized, if not destroyed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “two legislative appointees on a seven-member judicial nominating commission is constitutionally accommodated and does not necessarily violate Article V, § 1,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to provide by law, for the appointment of officials does not include the power to make appointments to positions in the executive and judicial departments.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.