People v. Freiman’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
June 1996
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Falgout v. People · People v. Swazo · Chavez v. District Court for the 17th Judicial District · People v. Driscoll · People v. Elmore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the county court dismisses a charge after holding a preliminary hearing under Crim. P. 5(a)(4), the exclusive remedy available to the prosecution is to request leave to file a direct information in the district court. If the district court denies the request, its decision may be appealed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Noline · People v. Noline“The trial court properly applied the standard [balancing the rights of the district attorney to prosecute against the rights of the accused] to the facts of this case. The trial judge found that the actions of the district attorney in first appealing the county court decision unsuccessfully and then attempting to file a direct information had become "oppressive."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Noline“The prosecuting attorney, with the consent of the court having trial jurisdiction, may file a direct information if: [[Image here]] (2) A preliminary hearing was held in the county court and the accused person was discharged....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Stanchieff
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.