Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 657 P2D 948 - People v. Quintero

People v. Quintero’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 2020

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

11019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Payton v. New York · Stone v. Powell · Brewer v. Williams · Time, Inc. v. Bon Air Hotel, Inc. · Taylor v. Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Evidence which is otherwise admissible in a criminal proceeding shall not be suppressed by the trial court if the court determines that the evidence was seized by a peace officer ... as a result of a good faith mistake or of a technical violation. (2) As used in subsection (1) of this section: (a) "Good faith mistake" means a reasonable judgmental error concerning the existence of facts which if true would be sufficient to constitute probable cause. (b) "Technical violation" means a reasonable good faith reliance upon a statute which is later ruled unconstitutional, a warrant which is later invalidated due to a good faith mistake, or a court precedent which is later overruled.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. ““Probable cause to arrest exists when the objective facts and circumstances available to a reasonably cautious officer warrant the belief that an offense has been or is being committed by the person arrested.” That is, probable cause to arrest requires that at the time an arrest is made the police have probable cause to believe a crime has been or is being committed and probable cause to believe the person to be arrested has committed or is committing the crime. “In determining whether there is probable cause to arrest, the totality of the facts and circumstances known to the officer at the time of arrest must be considered.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.