Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

657 S.E.2d 354

State v. Caple

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 2008

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2008-03-07

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2016

6 state decisions

Relies on Barham v. Hawk · Barham v. Hawk

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-03-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Justice HUDSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk,360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006).

¶2AFFIRMED.

/657/se2d/354 · .json · Public domain