Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

657 So. 2d 101

657 So.2d 101

94 La.App.3Cir. 1269

State v. Webster

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1995

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1995-04-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1995

1 state decisions

Relies on 653 So. 2d 1360 - State v. Mouton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-04-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

hPER CURIAM.

¶1For the reasons assigned in State v. Mouton, 94-1074 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/12/95); 653 So.2d 1360, defense counsel’s Motion to Withdraw is denied and the Anders brief filed with this court by defense counsel is rejected and ordered stricken. In view of our treatment of the Anders brief, defendant’s pro se brief is likewise ordered stricken and the permission previously granted the defendant to proceed pro se is revoked. See Local Rules of the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Internal Rule 4. We hereby order the defendant’s pro se brief be forwarded to defense counsel for consideration.

¶2Counsel for appellant is ordered to file assignments of error with the trial court within ten (10) days of this opinion. The Clerk of Court for the Parish of Rapides shall file with this court a supplemental record containing the assignments of error |2and any per curiam comments filed by the district court within ten (10) days of the filing of the assignments of error.

¶3Counsel for appellant is further ordered to file a brief in compliance with Mouton addressing the assignments of error within twenty-five (25) days of the date of this opinion. The appellee is given forty-five (45) days from the date of this opinion in which to file a brief.

¶4ANDERS AND PRO SE BRIEFS STRICKEN; MOTION TO WITHDRAW DENIED; PERMISSION TO PROCEED PRO SE REVOKED; CASE REMANDED FOR THE FILING OF ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR AND BRIEFING.

/657/so2d/101 · .json · Public domain