Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

657 So. 2d 1183

Van Doran v. Pope Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 4, 1995

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-01-04

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1997

2 state decisions

Relies on Wohlgamuth v. Central Maintenance & Welding · Braithwaite v. Department of Transportation

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-01-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

LAWRENCE, Judge,

¶1concurring and dissenting.

¶2I cannot agree that deemed earnings is a substantive right for some purposes, but a mere procedural device for other purposes. I nevertheless concur in the result, because reversal is required by precedent set in Wohlgamwth v. Central Maintenance & Welding, 600 So.2d 514, 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); and Braithwaite v. Department of Transportation, 622 So.2d 109, 111 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). I therefore join in the result.

/657/so2d/1183 · .json · Public domain