Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 657 SO2D 1230 - Rainer v. State

Rainer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2018

9 state decisions

40199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 566 So. 2d 69 - Young v. State · Chatman v. State · 520 So. 2d 320 - Piper v. State · Robbins v. Blackstone Valley National Bank · 609 So. 2d 76 - Gibbs v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any violation triggering a revocation of probation must be `willful' and `substantial,' Young v. State, 566 So.2d 69, 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.