657 So. 2d 152 - State v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2011
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Benton v. Maryland · 498 So. 2d 701 - State v. Mayeux · State v. Robertson · 578 So. 2d 533 - State v. Dobson · State v. Eames
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[j]ury tampering is any verbal or written communication or attempted communication, whether direct or indirect, made to any juror in a civil or criminal cause ... for the purpose of influencing the juror in respect to his verdict....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“While we would prefer to follow the ruling of the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mayeux, supra , we refuse to waste the limited judicial resources of this state in vain and futile acts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nazar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.