Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 657 SO2D 191 - Matthews v. Farley Industries

Matthews v. Farley Industries’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2001
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 309 So. 2d 283 - Landreneau v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company · Townsend v. PPG Industries, Inc. · Disotell v. Wadsworth Golf Const. Co. · 544 So. 2d 687 - Smith v. Hughes Wood Products, Inc. · 628 So. 2d 1204 - Townsend v. PPG Industries, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “B. Upon the application of any party in interest, on the ground of a change in conditions, the hearing officer may, after a contradictory hearing, review any award, and, on such review, may make an award ending, diminishing, or increasing the compensation previously awarded, subject to the maximum or minimum provided in the Workers’ Compensation Act, and shall state his conclusions of fact and rulings of law, and the director shall immediately send to the parties a copy of the award.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “causes of action existing at the time of final judgment arising out of the ... occurrence that is the subject matter of the litigation....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.