Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 657 So. 2d 258 - State v. Richard

657 So. 2d 258 - State v. Richard’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2017

4 state decisions

20199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 639 So. 2d 237 - State v. Smith · State v. Tompkins · 647 So. 2d 511 - State v. Guidry · 647 So. 2d 525 - State v. Thibodeaux · 596 So. 2d 327 - State v. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 893 allows the sentencing court to suspend sentence and grant probation on a defendant's first felony conviction, a defendant's status as a first felony offender does not preclude a sentence of incarceration. State v. Thomas, 596 So.2d 327 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1992). In deciding whether to grant a suspended sentence, the sentencing court may consider whatever factors and evidence it deems important to determine what sentence is in the best interests of the public and the defendant. State v. Vonhirshion, 610 So.2d 200 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1992).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The standard for appellate review for constitutional excessiveness is whether the sentence is `nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering' or is `grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.