Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

657 So. 2d 26

Docket No. 95-965.

Leone v. State

Richard LEONE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 9, 1995.

Rehearing Denied July 21, 1995.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-06-09

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2005

10 state decisions

Relies on 652 So. 2d 409 - Isley v. State · Florida Bar re Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar · 648 So. 2d 100 - Hardwick v. Dugger

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-06-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*27 Richard Leone, Raiford, pro se.

¶2No appearance for respondent.

¶3W. SHARP, Judge.

¶4We deny Leone's petition for writ of habeas corpus. This petition is an abuse of process. Leone has filed three prior appeals pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850,[1] one previous petition for writ of error coram nobis,[2] and one other petition for writ of habeas corpus for a belated appeal.[3] Aside from the fact that Leone's arguments in this proceeding have little or no merit, they could and should have been raised either on direct appeal or encompassed in Leone's first rule 3.850 motion. Hardwick v. Dugger,648 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1994). Enough surely is enough. See Isley v. State,652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

¶5DENIED.

¶6GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

NOTES

¶7[1] Leone v. State,519 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) (Case No. 87-2222) (PCA).

¶8[2] Leone v. State,591 So.2d 663 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) (Case No. 91-2425) (PCA).

¶9[3] Leone v. State, Case No. 93-609 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 30, 1993) (Order).

/657/so2d/26 · .json · Public domain