Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

657 So. 2d 38

Lockett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-06-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1997

1 state decisions

Relies on Nebraska v. Wyoming · Payless Wholesale Distributor, Inc. v. Albert Culver (P.R.) Inc. · Kent v. Bechtel Group, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-06-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

W. SHARP, Judge,

¶1concurring specially.

¶2In order to forestall Lockett from filing a fifth or sixth rule 3.850 motion, we should affirm the trial court’s denial of this, his fourth motion, because it is successive and improper. Stewart v. State, 632 So.2d 59 (Fla.1993); Zeigler v. State, 632 So.2d 48 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 104, 130 L.Ed.2d 52 (1994); Foster v. State, 614 So.2d 455 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 398, 126 L.Ed.2d 346 (1993); Davis v. State, 589 So.2d 896 (Fla.1991); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Johnson v. State, 652 So.2d 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Enough is enough.

/657/so2d/38 · .json · Public domain