Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 657 So. 2d 549 - State v. Wilson

657 So. 2d 549 - State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2001
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Logiudice v. Georgia · 441 So. 2d 1195 - State v. Belton · 626 So. 2d 707 - State v. Tucker · 434 So. 2d 389 - State v. Andrishok · 626 So. 2d 720 - State v. Tucker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The officer testified that the police car did not have its top lights or siren on. The police were not out of the car when the defendant dropped the bottle, they did not approach the defendant with their weapons drawn, and they did not try to apprehend the defendant until after he dropped the bottle and ran away. Under the totality of circumstances, we do not find that there was any force used by the police that was virtually certain to result in an imminent actual stop of the defendant when he abandoned the bottle. Id., 657 So.2d at 551 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the proximity of the police in relation to the defendant at the outset of the encounter; (2) whether the individual has been surrounded by the police; (3) whether the police approached the individual with their weapons drawn; (4) whether the police and/or the individual are on foot or in motorized vehicles during the encounter; (5) the location and characteristics of the area where the encounter takes place; and (6) the number of police officers involved in the encounter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.