Preserve Estates v. BRYANT CONTRACTING’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 474 So. 2d 212 - Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co. · 456 So. 2d 1175 - Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Young · 542 So. 2d 1327 - Schnurmacher Holding, Inc. v. Noriega · McDaniel v. Berhalter · 448 So. 2d 593 - McDonald v. Hardee County School Bd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he fact that Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So.2d 212 (Fla.1985), requires a court to add prejudgment interest to a determination of liquidated damages by a jury or judge does not overcome the provisions of sections 682.13 and 682.14, Florida Statutes (1993). Those statutes allow a court to vacate or modify a final arbitration award in very limited circumstances, none of which apply here; the permitted grounds do not include legal error by the arbitrator.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.