657 So. 2d 628 - Doe v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2017
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Colonial Village, Inc. v. Spann · Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. · Comora v. Radell · 561 So. 2d 1371 - Stuka v. Fleming · 576 So. 2d 470 - Koslowski v. Sanchez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to be paid out of the patient’s compensation fund, then the trier of fact shall determine at a subsequent trial which shall take place only after the board shall have been given an adequate opportunity to conduct discovery, identify and retain expert witnesses, and prepare a defense, the amount of claimant’s damages, if any, in excess of the amount already paid by the insurer of the health care provider or self-insured health care Inprovider. The trier of fact shall determine the amount for which the fund is liable and render a finding and judgment accordingly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Appellants’ challenge to the admissibility of evidence on the basis that the misconduct is not "malpractice” as defined by the act and that some of the misconduct occurred during a time when the provider’s liability was not covered is nothing more than an attempt to contest the liability of Dr, Lichtenstein with regard to his conduct with the plaintiffs. We need not address the merits of appellants’ arguments regarding the admissibility of evidence; such evidence is deemed irrelevant by the statutory scheme of the medical malpractice act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Joint Petition for Court Approval of the Settlement of a Medical Malpractice Claim and Claimant's Demand for Payment of Damages from the Patient's Compensation Fund”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Horil v. Scheinhorn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.