657 So. 2d 8 - Perea v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 654 So. 2d 552 - State v. Gray · Teague v. Tennessee · Trotter v. State · 462 So. 2d 1075 - Mills v. State · 656 So. 2d 426 - Bryant v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The juror at issue turned in a questionnaire answer indicating that he was unsure whether he could give defendant a fair trial. This was partly because of a sexual molestation experience of one of the juror's family members. As was true in the Bryant case, the prospective juror indicated that he would follow the court's instructions, but his other responses on the ability to give a fair trial were equivocal. We conclude that there must be a new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`whether the juror can lay aside any bias or prejudice and render his [or her] verdict solely upon the evidence presented and the instructions on the law given to him [or her] by the court.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.