¶1ORDER
¶2This is a direct appeal from a jury conviction for forgery, in violation of § 570.090.-1(4), RSMo 1978.
¶3No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed.
¶4All concur.
¶5Rule 30.25(b).
657 S.W.2d 265
State v. Talley
Decided June 28, 1983
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1983-06-28
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1992
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1983-06-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →