Camera v. Fogg’s Empirical Analysis
658 F.2d 80 · 1981
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2000 · most notably United States v. Curcio (1982), Winkler v. Keane (1993)
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Dukes v. Warden, Connecticut State Prison · Missouri v. Sours · William Foxworth v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In every case there are numerous critical, strategic decisions which must be made by an individual charged with a crime, such as whether to become a witness for the State and against his partners in crime, whether to plead guilty to lesser offenses, and whether to take the stand in his own behalf. These decisions can be adequately made only by a defendant who is represented by an attorney who is uncompromisingly dedicated to the interests of that one defendant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“"It is sufficient to point out that the defense could have been raised and that there was a basis for it, and that it would have served to disassociate [the co-defendants] from [the more culpable defendant] whose interests clearly diverged from [the co-defendants']."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tate v. State“We believe it unnecessary to determine whether or not a defense of duress could have been established, for such an inquiry goes to the question of prejudice, an issue which the Supreme Court has held we need not reach.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tate v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.