Woodard v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis
658 F.2d 989 · 1981
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Penagaricano v. Llenza (1984), Martin v. Helstad (1983)
6 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Califano v. Sanders · City of New Orleans v. Dukes · Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz · American Sterilizer Co. v. Sybron Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well established that, despite Mindes' doctrine of 'nonreviewability,' claims that the Army failed to follow its own regulations or failed to afford procedural due process are reviewable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“has no reasonable expectation of continued employment and thus no property interest protected by the due process clause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`in which an officer is asking a court to interfere with the discretionary rating given the officer's performance'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.