Henry v. Storey’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Judgment as a matter of law “is appropriate if, after a party has presented its evidence, the ‘court finds that a reasonable jury would not have a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for the party on that issue.’ ” Henry v. Storey, 658 F.3d 1235, 1237-38 (10th Cir.2011) (quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(a)(1)). Stated differently, it is “appropriate only if the evidence points but one way and is susceptible to no reasonable inferences which may support the nonmoving party’s position.” Elm Ridge [Exploration, Inc., LLC v. Engle, 721 F.3d 1199 ] at 1216 [ (10th Cir.2013) ] (internal quotation marks omitted). “We draw all inferences from the evidence in favor of the non-moving party, and do not weigh the evidence or judge witness credibility.” Henry, 658 F.3d at 1238 .”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Bay v. Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC · 71 F. Supp. 3d 1257 - Michaels v. City of McPherson

2. “We draw all inferences from the evidence in favor of the non-moving party, and do not weigh the evidence or judge witness credibility.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Burke v. Regalado