United States v. Elbert’s Empirical Analysis
658 F.3d 220 · 2011
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2422 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on Anders v. California · George Smith Warden v. Lee Robbins · McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1 · United States v. Fleming · United States v. Verkhoglyad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the requirement that the district judge provide a written statement of reasons for the sentence imposed [also] assists in the collection of data by the Bureau of Prisons and the Sentencing Commission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.