Williams v. Hobbs’s Empirical Analysis
658 F.3d 842 · 2011
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · Bounds v. Smith · Collins v. Youngblood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n the usual case in which all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial, the balance of factors to be considered under the pendent jurisdiction doctrine ... will point toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zubrod v. Hoch“district court [that] has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zubrod v. Hoch“may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Zubrod v. Hoch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.