Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 658 FSUPP2D 921 - Luxpro Corp. v. Apple, Inc.

Luxpro Corp. v. Apple, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit · Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. · California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited · United Mine Workers v. Pennington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “has not shown that its post-litigation conduct of sending warning letters, making threats, and exerting pressure on [the plaintiff's] clients were incidental to the prosecution of the foreign litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.