People v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
April 1991
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Franks v. Delaware · United States v. Moore · People v. Dailey · United States v. Alexander · People v. Langford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he motions and the affidavit which were filed to support disclosure of the identity of the informant were conclusory and did not, in our view, comply with the prerequisites required by the Dailey case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Flores“By this opinion the bench and bar will be on notice that any attack on the affidavit supporting a search warrant can be commenced by surmise and conjecture.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Winden“once the hearing was held and an order for an in camera hearing was entered the record suggests that the prosecution voiced no objection to the procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Winden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.