Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 658 P.2d 74 - Rouse v. Munroe

Rouse v. Munroe’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably Mobil Coal Producing, Inc. v. Parks (1985), Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc v. Shoshone River Power Inc

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

2301983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co. · Fuchs Murane v. Goe · Shepard v. Top Hat Land & Cattle Co. · Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co. · Peters Grazing Association v. Legerski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We repeated the basic purpose and general rules of contract interpretation in Amoco Production Company v. Stauffer Chemical Company of Wyoming, Wyo., 612 P.2d 463, 465 (1980): "`Our basic purpose in construing or interpreting a contract is to determine the intention and understanding of the parties. Fuchs v. Goe, 62 Wyo. 134 , 163 P.2d 783 (1945); Shellhart v. Axford, Wyo., 485 P.2d 1031 (1971); Oregon Short Line Railroad Company v. Idaho Stockyards Company, 12 Utah 2d 205 , 364 P.2d 826 (1961). If the contract is in writing and the language is clear and unambiguous, the intention is to be secured from the words of the contract. Pilcher v. Hamm, Wyo., 351 P.2d 1041 (1960); Fuchs v. Goe, supra; Hollabaugh v. Kolbet, Wyo., 604 P.2d 1359 (1980); Wyoming Bank and Trust Company v. Waugh, Wyo., 606 P.2d 725 (1980). And the contract as a whole should be considered, with each part being read in light of all other parts. Shepard v. Top Hat Land & Cattle Co., Wyo., 560 P.2d 730 (1977); Rossi v. Percifield, Wyo., 527 P.2d 819 (1974); Shellhart v. Axford, supra; Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Company, Wyo., 597 P.2d 945 (1979). The interpretation and construction is done by the court as a matter of law. Hollabaugh v. Kolbet, supra; Bulis v. Wells, Wyo., 565 P.2d 487 (1977); Shepard v. Top Hat Land & Cattle Co., supra.' "A more recent case to the same effect is Rouse v. Munroe, Wyo., 658 P.2d 74 (1983). "In interpreting a conveyance of a mineral interest, the court m”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “merely an estimation on their part of the amount of acre age”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “estimated at approximately 10 acres, more or less.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.