Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

658 So. 2d 1101

Gardner v. Stock

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-07-14

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2019

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relies on 611 So. 2d 1354 - Bussey v. Bussey · McMonagle v. McMonagle · Gardner v. Stock

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-07-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Joyce Ann Gardner appeals the amended final judgment of dissolution rendered by the trial court upon remand from this court’s mandate in Gardner v. Stock, 645 So.2d 33 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). This court directed the trial court to:

1. Determine whether the vehicles and the liabilities set forth in paragraph 14 of the final judgment are marital or non-marital. Bussey v. Bussey, 611 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); § 61.075(3), Fla.Stat.
2. Reference the factors listed in section 61.075(1) in order to justify the distribution of the marital assets. McMonagle v. McMonagle, 617 So.2d 373 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

¶2Id.

¶3Upon remand, the trial court focused on paragraph one of this court’s order. Unfortunately, the trial court failed to comply with this court’s direction to reference the factors required by section 61.075(1).

¶4Finding this to be the only error on appeal, we again remand with instructions to comply with the requirements of section 61.075(1).

¶5REVERSED and REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS.

PETERSON, C.J., and GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
/658/so2d/1101 · .json · Public domain