658 So. 2d 1185 - Holmes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2008
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 487 So. 2d 1045 - State v. Whitfield · 572 So. 2d 1368 - Larson v. State · 596 So. 2d 758 - Williams v. State · 641 So. 2d 432 - Watson v. State · Jaworski v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant, represented by counsel, may not sit idly by in open court while fees or costs are improperly assessed by the trial judge, fail to raise any objection whatsoever to the imposition of those improper costs and then be heard to argue on appeal that the trial court committed reversible error in imposing those costs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“for the very simple reason that appellant failed to object when those costs were orally pronounced in open court by the trial judge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Mt is well established that a court lacks the power to impose costs in a criminal case unless specifically authorized by statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chapman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.