658 So. 2d 166 - Robichaud v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2017
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 629 So. 2d 90 - Munoz v. State · 594 So. 2d 275 - Herrera v. State · Hoffiz v. Valdes-Fauli, Cobb & Petrey, P.A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) “[Wjhether an agent of the government induced the accused to commit the offense charged;” (2) “whether the accused was predisposed to commit the offense charged; that is, whether the accused was awaiting any propitious opportunity or was ready and willing, without persuasion, to commit the offense;” and (3) “whether the entrapment evaluation should be submitted to a jury.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Irsula v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.