Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

658 So. 2d 174

Davie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-07-26

Relies on 655 So. 2d 111 - Reyes v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-07-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2012

4 state decisions

20199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant, Margaret Lee Davie, challenges the trial court’s judgments and sentences imposed upon her after a jury found her guilty of possession of cocaine contrary *175to section 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), and possession of drug paraphernalia contrary to section 893.147, Florida Statutes (1993).

¶2We find no reversible error in regard to the appellant’s challenge concerning her convictions and, therefore, affirm the judgments and sentences. However, we agree with appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in assessing certain costs.

¶3The trial court ordered appellant to pay $100 to the Hillsborough County Court Improvement Fund. This was improper because there is no statutory basis which authorizes the court to assess this cost. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

¶4We, accordingly, strike the $100 in costs but affirm the judgments and sentences in all other respects.

¶5Affirmed as modified.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
/658/so2d/174 · .json · Public domain